linux-kernel - is there any chance of cleaning up the "inline" chaos?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004181605220.4775@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:06:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: is there any chance of cleaning up the "inline" chaos?


  i mean, how many different definitions of inline are necessary?

#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \
    !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) || (__GNUC__ < 4)
# define inline         inline          __attribute__((always_inline))
# define __inline__     __inline__      __attribute__((always_inline))
# define __inline       __inline        __attribute__((always_inline))
#endif

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/