[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271623285.1730.56.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:41:25 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is there any chance of cleaning up the "inline" chaos?
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 16:06 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i mean, how many different definitions of inline are necessary?
>
> #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \
> !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) || (__GNUC__ < 4)
> # define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> # define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
> # define __inline __inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> #endif
Heave to, have at it.
$ git grep -w "inline" * | wc -l
35526
$ git grep -w "__inline__" * | wc -l
872
$ git grep -w "__inline" * | wc -l
17
It looks like __inline is almost exclusively in staging
and should be easy to fix/change
__inline__ is spread around all over the place
$ git grep -wl __inline__ * | wc -l
265
It could be converted over time or in a single sweep
like the recent slab changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists