[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100419163217.GB32034@random.random>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:32:17 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, r6144 <rainy6144@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: Process-shared futexes on hugepages puts the kernel in an
infinite loop in 2.6.32.11; is this fixed now?
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:18:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Well, most poison values have that problem and still we have them. Also
That would better be fixed too to stay <4096 for higher chance of
bug-detection, it doesn't make this case correct ;).
> on 64bit machines you can use POISON_POINTER_DELTA to map it outside the
> virtual address range.
We've thousands of magic values there, I don't see much benefit from
POISON_POINTER_DELTA other than being able to call it
0xdeadbeef+POISON_POINTER_DELTA ;). We always look the assembly to
find the actual real raw pointer value (without the field offset) so I
think using a range between 0xaaa and 0xbbb for the error pointers, is
functional enough, but it's up to you as long as it is a address range
that can't be used by userland it's surely ok ;).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists