linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004211244230.7579@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:49:11 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task_struct
 declaration

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote:

> >> BTW, I don't think compile warning fixes are trivial enough to go
> >> to trivial@...nel.org.
> >
> >Why?
> >
> Usually compile warnings fixes go into -mm, some coding style fixes
> too.

Well, I personally don't care that much, submit your patches whereever you 
wish. 

The point of trivial tree is to take off load from other maintainers 
(including Andrew) so that focusing on The Real Things is possible.

See relevant section of Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

But, as I said, I don't care that much. If you want to avoid trivial tree 
for some reason, feel free to do so.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/