[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BCF7037.9070301@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:37:59 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gpxe-devel@...erboot.org,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI for
iBFT.
On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:21:28 +0000
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> For machines with IBFT 1.03 do scan the ACPI table for 'iBFT'
>> or for 'IBFT'. If the machine is in UEFI mode, only do the ACPI
>> table scan. For all other machines (pre IBFT 1.03) do
>> a memory scan if not found in the ACPI tables.
>>
>> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@...nel.org>
>
> The Author: line is unneeded and inappropriate here. That's what the
> From: line does.
>
>> Acked-by: Peter Jones<pjones@...hat.com>
>> Tested-by: Mike Christie<michaelc@...wisc.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@...nel.org>
>
> Your covering email indicates that Mike and Peter wrote the patches,
> but neither of the patches have their signoffs. Can we please sort all
> this out?
>
I did a small fix to
ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to
compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie
<michaelc@...wisc.edu>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by:
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu> if needed.
I did not do any changes to
ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.
I tested both patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists