[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100422120837.GE27497@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:08:37 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure
On Thu, Apr 22 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Thu, 22 April 2010 12:39:53 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > Here's a series for fixing these. At this point they are totally
> > untested except that I did compile them. Note that your analysis
> > appeared correct for all cases but ocfs2, which does use get_sb_bdev()
> > and hence gets ->s_bdi assigned.
> >
> > You can see them here, I'll post the series soon:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-linus
> >
> > The first patch is a helper addition, the rest are per-fs fixups.
>
> Looks good at a cursory glance. What's still missing is some sort of
> assertion. You are a smart person and missed this problem, twice even.
> Even if you hadn't, a not so smart person can add a new filesystem and
> miss s_bdi, like I did. We want some automatism to catch this.
I totally agree, we want some way to catch this problem in the future.
Really the check needs to be something ala:
if (!sb->s_bdi && mnt_has_storage_backing() && rw_mount)
yell_and_fail;
but I'm not sure how best to accomplish that. We can check for ->s_bdev
and mtd like you did, but that does not catch network file systems for
instance.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists