[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100422121702.GG27309@logfs.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:17:02 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure
On Thu, 22 April 2010 14:08:37 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> I totally agree, we want some way to catch this problem in the future.
> Really the check needs to be something ala:
>
> if (!sb->s_bdi && mnt_has_storage_backing() && rw_mount)
> yell_and_fail;
>
> but I'm not sure how best to accomplish that. We can check for ->s_bdev
> and mtd like you did, but that does not catch network file systems for
> instance.
One way would be to either add a flag to all safe filesystems or create
a noop_bdi for them. It adds a line of code and some bytes[*] per
instance to most filesystems, but that's the only catchall I can think
of.
I guess if noone comes up with a better plan I'll look into that.
[*] Maybe we can steal a bit somewhere to make it less expensive.
Jörn
--
You can't tell where a program is going to spend its time. Bottlenecks
occur in surprising places, so don't try to second guess and put in a
speed hack until you've proven that's where the bottleneck is.
-- Rob Pike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists