[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100422132025.GZ15159@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:20:25 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, gorcunov@...il.com,
aris@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] [watchdog] convert touch_softlockup_watchdog to
touch_watchdog
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:46:12PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Hence I guess we want to keep the current state:
> > >
> > > - touch_nmi_watchdog() = touch softlockup and nmi watchdogs
> > > - touch_softlockup_watchdog() = only touch softlockup watchdog
> >
> > Hmm ok I see what you are saying. A little tweak and I have this
> > compiled-tested only patch that I think satisifies you.
> >
> > I didn't really touch the touch_nmi_watchdog() code in the kernel, so it
> > still calls a stub function in kernel/watchdog.c. Add a boolean to that
> > path and I think it accomplishes the logic you are looking for.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Don
>
>
> Yeah looks good.
>
> Could you send this patch with a changelog and your sign-off?
I thought about including it when I refresh the patch series with the
other changes you suggested. Do you prefer it to be separate?
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists