[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100422185333.GB5600@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:53:35 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, gorcunov@...il.com,
aris@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] [watchdog] convert touch_softlockup_watchdog to
touch_watchdog
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:20:25AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:46:12PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Hence I guess we want to keep the current state:
> > > >
> > > > - touch_nmi_watchdog() = touch softlockup and nmi watchdogs
> > > > - touch_softlockup_watchdog() = only touch softlockup watchdog
> > >
> > > Hmm ok I see what you are saying. A little tweak and I have this
> > > compiled-tested only patch that I think satisifies you.
> > >
> > > I didn't really touch the touch_nmi_watchdog() code in the kernel, so it
> > > still calls a stub function in kernel/watchdog.c. Add a boolean to that
> > > path and I think it accomplishes the logic you are looking for.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Don
> >
> >
> > Yeah looks good.
> >
> > Could you send this patch with a changelog and your sign-off?
>
> I thought about including it when I refresh the patch series with the
> other changes you suggested. Do you prefer it to be separate?
I was about to apply the series because there were mostly minor
things to fix.
But I would indeed prefer you repost a new series with the reviews
addressed, whatever this patch is a delta or a fixed existing one.
I will more likely forget things in the middle than you will.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists