[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100423020632.GA7383@spritzerA.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:06:32 +0900
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rmap: fix page_address_in_vma() to walk through
anon_vma_chain
> However, for anonymous pages, page_address_in_vma only
> ever determined whether the page _could_ be part of the
> VMA, never whether it actually was.
>
> The function page_address_in_vma has always given
> false positives, which means all of the callers already
> check that the page is actually part of the process.
I see.
> This means we may be able to get away with not verifying
> the anon_vma at all. After all, verifying that the VMA
> has the anon_vma mapped does not mean the VMA has this
> page...
>
> Doing away with that check gets rid of your locking
> conundrum :)
I get it, thank you :)
I'll rewrite fix patch based on your comments.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists