[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271999639-23605-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:13:53 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"K . Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] hw-breakpoints updates
Hi,
Paul, there are some sh changes in this set. I couldn't test them
by myself, do you think you could give it a try?
You can pull the set from this branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
perf/hw-breakpoints
This new shot brings the following features:
- You can now profile userspace memory accesses from perf, whenever
you are profiling cpu wide or task wide
- You can profile kernel memory accesses from perf if you are
doing a task bound profiling (previously you could do it only for
cpu wide profiling). That requires admin privileges though.
So if you want to profile the global variable "A" in your "test"
application. Get the address of "A" and do:
perf record -e mem:addr_of_A:rw ./test
- Separate constraint space between data and instruction breakpoints.
If you have separate addr registers for your instruction and data
breakpoints, one type won't eat the remaining slot constraints of
the other in the constraint table.
- Handle the weight of a breakpoint. Simple breakpoints only consume
one register but range breakpoints or other complicated things
may eat more. Handle this case in the constraint table.
- Handle the fact we don't always know at build time the total number
of available breakpoint registers. For example Arm needs to get this
information dynamically on runtime.
TODO:
- ptrace usually get breakpoint informations through virtual arch
regs provided by the user. This requires a wasteful level of indirection
where we need to translate the arch info to generic info, and to translate
back again to arch info. I need to implement a shortcut for the ptrace
case. Not only is it wasteful, but we may lose some information in the
process as the generic interface will never be able to integrate 100%
of the subtleties that archs can implement for their breakpoints which
can be expressed through arch register images in ptrace.
We only want the most common features in the generic interface.
- breakpoints are interesting with perf but only for addresses we
know in advance (global variables). We need a trick to get dynamically
allocated memory addresses. May be we could think about a generic
solution with kprobes (which could then be usable later with uprobes) so
that could get every instances of a given structure as they are allocated
(or get these addresses later from a given point, still with kprobes).
Once we get that, we could have a watchpoint based profiling tool that
really rocks.
Frederic Weisbecker (6):
hw-breakpoints: Tag ptrace breakpoint as exclude_kernel
hw-breakpoints: Check disabled breakpoints again
hw-breakpoints: Change/Enforce some breakpoints policies
hw-breakpoints: Separate constraint space for data and instruction
breakpoints
hw-breakpoints: Handle breakpoint weight in allocation constraints
hw-breakpoints: Get the number of available registers on boot
dynamically
arch/Kconfig | 11 ++
arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/sh/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 8 ++-
arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 31 +-----
arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 10 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 41 +------
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 25 ++++-
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 2 +
kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c | 26 ++----
13 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists