linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/6] hw-breakpoints: Check disabled breakpoints again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1271999639-23605-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:13:55 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"K . Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] hw-breakpoints: Check disabled breakpoints again

We stopped checking disabled breakpoints because we weren't
allowing breakpoints on NULL addresses. And gdb tends to set
NULL addresses on inactive breakpoints.

But refusing NULL addresses was actually a regression that has
been fixed now. There is no reason anymore to not validate
inactive breakpoint settings.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: K. Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |   12 +-----------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 03808ed..9ed9ae3 100644
--- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -316,17 +316,7 @@ int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Ptrace breakpoints can be temporary perf events only
-	 * meant to reserve a slot. In this case, it is created disabled and
-	 * we don't want to check the params right now (as we put a null addr)
-	 * But perf tools create events as disabled and we want to check
-	 * the params for them.
-	 * This is a quick hack that will be removed soon, once we remove
-	 * the tmp breakpoints from ptrace
-	 */
-	if (!bp->attr.disabled || !bp->overflow_handler)
-		ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp, bp->ctx->task);
+	ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp, bp->ctx->task);
 
 	/* if arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() fails then release bp slot */
 	if (ret)
-- 
1.6.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/