[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100424151716.GD10840@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:17:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Eric Lescouet <Eric.Lescouet@...tualLogix.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USBIP (staging) driver's dependency on drivers/usb/core
internal headers
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 03:24:17AM +0200, Eric Lescouet wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 08:04 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Eric Lescouet wrote:
> >
> >> Well, most of the files include hcd.h (which includes hub.h),
> >> only ~4 of them directly use hub.h.
> >
> > Oh. Okay, that makes life easier. Probably some of the files which
> > include hub.h directly also include hcd.h.
> >
> >> So what's your vote? rename hub.h into ch11.h?
> >
> > Yeah, go ahead. I like the idea of the kernel containing information
> > about Chapter 11. (Although I haven't heard of anyone yet going
> > bankrupt as a result of using Linux...)
> >
> > Alan Stern
> >
>
> It looks like couple of files in drivers/usb/core and usb/host have been
> modified already in latest snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5).
> Is it still ok to provide the patches against the mainline (2.6.34-rc5)
> or should I do it against the snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5)?
The latest snapshot is best.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists