[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD24841.1010206@VirtualLogix.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:24:17 +0200
From: Eric Lescouet <Eric.Lescouet@...tualLogix.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USBIP (staging) driver's dependency on drivers/usb/core internal
headers
On 04/23/2010 08:04 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Eric Lescouet wrote:
>
>> Well, most of the files include hcd.h (which includes hub.h),
>> only ~4 of them directly use hub.h.
>
> Oh. Okay, that makes life easier. Probably some of the files which
> include hub.h directly also include hcd.h.
>
>> So what's your vote? rename hub.h into ch11.h?
>
> Yeah, go ahead. I like the idea of the kernel containing information
> about Chapter 11. (Although I haven't heard of anyone yet going
> bankrupt as a result of using Linux...)
>
> Alan Stern
>
It looks like couple of files in drivers/usb/core and usb/host have been
modified already in latest snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5).
Is it still ok to provide the patches against the mainline (2.6.34-rc5)
or should I do it against the snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5)?
Thanks,
Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists