[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD31891.6080508@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:13:05 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf: Add a perf trace option to check samples ordering
reliability
Hi Frederic,
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> To ensure sample events time reordering is reliable, add a -d option
> to perf trace to check that automatically.
Just out of curiosity, is there any possibility to add
other debugging options to perf-trace?
If so, I think we can pass some arguments for
this -d option, e.g. "-d ordering,events" and so on.
Just an idea.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists