[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD319B8.1030508@VirtualLogix.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:18:00 +0200
From: Eric Lescouet <Eric.Lescouet@...tualLogix.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB: make hub.h, hcd.h public (drivers dependency),
linux-2.6.34-rc5
On 04/24/2010 05:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:35:01AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0200, Eric Lescouet wrote:
>>> The usbcore headers:hcd.h and hub.h are shared between usbcore,
>>> HCDs and a couple of other drivers (e.g. USBIP modules).
>>> So, it makes sense to move them into a more public location and
>>> to cleanup dependency of those modules on kernel internal headers.
>>> Both are moved into include/linux/usb/
>>
>> Just move one at a time. Patches should do one thing only. So this
>> should be at least 2 patches.
>>
>> And I thought you were going to rename hub.h to ch11.h instead?
>
> Oops, I now see patch 2 :)
>
> Anyway, how about 3 patches here? Your last one is fine, but make the
> first one into 2 different ones? One that does hcd.h and then one that
> does hub.h.
Why not... ;-)
Since I'll do it again, I could use 2.6.34-rc5-git5, as per your request.
I was not so sure how to get the full source for the snapshot...
Should I apply 2.6.34-rc5-git5 patch onto 2.6.34-rc5 tree ?
Thanks,
Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists