[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100426131843.GA28332@sig21.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:18:43 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Q: sched_clock() vs. clocksource, how to implement correctly
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:50:11PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> /*
> * Orion's sched_clock implementation. It has a resolution of
> * at least 7.5ns (133MHz TCLK) and a maximum value of 834 days.
> *
> * Because the hardware timer period is quite short (21 secs if
> * 200MHz TCLK) and because cnt32_to_63() needs to be called at
> * least once per half period to work properly, a kernel timer is
> * set up to ensure this requirement is always met.
> */
> #define TCLK2NS_SCALE_FACTOR 8
I found the following discussion of the sched_clock()
implementation trade-offs very informative:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/15/299
It mentions clocksource_calc_mult_shift() which was added in 2.6.33,
however I had some difficulties understanding the meaning of the minsec
parameter, especially since all existing callers use a value of 4.
But when using minsec = 365*24*60*60 (1 year) it results in the shift value of 8.
So finally the pieces connect together :-)
> BTW, even though this uses TCLK2NS_SCALE_FACTOR of 8, the same file
> uses a shift vaue of 20 for the orion_clksrc...
It seems clocksource_cyc2ns() is used in kernel/time/timekeeping.c
and kernel/time/clocksource.c only on relatively
small delta values, so there's no need to worry
about overflow and a large clocksource.shift and .mult is OK.
(Apparently the minsec value of 4 mentioned above is suitable
for timekeeping? Where does the 4 come from?)
Thanks,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists