| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:59:15 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Steve deRosier <steve@...ybit.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: April 27 (wireless/libertas warnings) On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > drivers/net/wireless/libertas_tf/deb_defs.h:12:1: warning: "pr_fmt" redefined > include/linux/kernel.h:376:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > drivers/net/wireless/libertas_tf/deb_defs.h:12:1: warning: "pr_fmt" redefined > include/linux/kernel.h:376:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition Yup, just had this exchange w/ Stephen... The problem comes from including slab.h before deb_defs.h (as done in linux-next). The version in wireless-testing avoids the warning by including the headers in the other order, but that is a bit ugly. Does anyone know if it is OK to #undef pr_fmt before defining it in deb_defs.h? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists