[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10533.1272471159@localhost>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:12:39 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Scott Smedley <ss@....gov.au>,
Jason Baldus <jason.baldus@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Harley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/staging/dt3155: Integrate 3 badly styled files into 1 clean file
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:00:30 PDT, Joe Perches said:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 22:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I seem to be learning that you little taste.
> > -ENOPARSE
>
> Choosing competing patches based on date received
> order not quality is poor taste.
So you're saying when Greg gets a somewhat ugly but passable patch 2 weeks ago,
he's supposed to *just know* that you'll be submitting a possibly better one 2
weeks later and wait for it to show up?
How is that supposed to work in reality?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists