lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:12:39 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Scott Smedley <ss@....gov.au>,
	Jason Baldus <jason.baldus@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Harley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/staging/dt3155: Integrate 3 badly styled files into 1 clean file

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:00:30 PDT, Joe Perches said:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 22:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I seem to be learning that you little taste.
> > -ENOPARSE
> 
> Choosing competing patches based on date received
> order not quality is poor taste.

So you're saying when Greg gets a somewhat ugly but passable patch 2 weeks ago,
he's supposed to *just know* that you'll be submitting a possibly better one 2
weeks later and wait for it to show up?

How is that supposed to work in reality?




Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ