linux-kernel - Re: r8169 INFO: inconsistent lock state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100430.162053.24603839.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	romieu@...zoreil.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 INFO: inconsistent lock state

From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:15:56 +0200

> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> :
> [...]
>> So we have following illegal chain (process context, not softirq)
>> 
>> rtl8169_reset_task() -> tl8169_rx_interrupt() -> netif_receive_skb()
>> 
>> And normally, commit 630b943c tried to change this chain to :
>> 
>> rtl8169_reset_task() -> tl8169_rx_interrupt() -> netif_rx()
>> 
>> I have no idea why it doesnt work.
> 
> 630b943c appears to be in net-next.
> 
> Oops ?

I just tossed this into net-2.6, thanks for noticing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/