linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201005010108.28593.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sat, 1 May 2010 01:08:28 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>, aili@...eaurora.org,
	dwalker@...eaurora.org, tiwai@...e.de, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
	davidb@...cinc.com, mcgrof@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
	"linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430

On Saturday 01 May 2010, mark gross wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:13:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday 30 April 2010, mark gross wrote:
> > > The following is a refresh of the PM_QOS implementation, this patch
> > > updates some documentation input I got from Randy.
> > > 
> > > This patch changes the string based list management to a handle base
> > > implementation to help with the hot path use of pm-qos, it also renames
> > > much of the API to use "request" as opposed to "requirement" that was
> > > used in the initial implementation.  I did this because request more
> > > accurately represents what it actually does.
> > > 
> > > Also, I added a string based ABI for users wanting to use a string
> > > interface.  So if the user writes 0xDDDDDDDD formatted hex it will be
> > > accepted by the interface.  (someone asked me for it and I don't think
> > > it hurts anything.)
> > > 
> > > I really would like to get this refresh taken care of.  Its been taking
> > > me too long to close this.  please review or include it in next.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > 
> > Well, I'd take it to suspend-2.6/linux-next, but first, it touches
> > subsystems whose maintainers were not in the Cc list, like the network
> > drivers, wireless and ACPI.  The changes are trivial, so I hope they don't
> > mind.
> > 
> > Second, my tree is based on the Linus' tree rather than linux-next and
> > the change in net/mac80211/scan.c doesn't seem to match that.  Please tell me
> > what I'm supposed to do about that.
> 
> You can waite for monday and I'll send a rebased version to linus' tree.
> 
> I thought linux-next was where folks wanted me to put it.
> 
> I'll email out a new one monday.

Great, thanks!

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/