[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272906679.1642.152.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 19:11:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Take all anon_vma locks in anon_vma_lock
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 19:02 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > This does leave me worrying about concurrent faults poking at
> > vma->vm_end without synchronization.
>
> I didn't check this patch in detail yet. I agree it can be removed and
> I think it can be safely replaced with the page_table_lock.
Sure, it could probably be replaced with the ptl, but a single
anon_vma->lock would I think be better since there's more of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists