[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100503170230.GF19891@random.random>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 19:02:30 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Take all anon_vma locks in anon_vma_lock
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This does leave me worrying about concurrent faults poking at
> vma->vm_end without synchronization.
I didn't check this patch in detail yet. I agree it can be removed and
I think it can be safely replaced with the page_table_lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists