[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272997363.9739.232.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:22:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
efault@....de, avi@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf: add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out()
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 19:22 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/04/2010 07:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:38 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out() so that its argument matches
> >> those of trace_sched_switch(). This will help unifying notifiers in
> >> sched.
> >
> > The alternative is dropping rq from the trace events, its not like
> > anybody outside sched.o can do anything sensible with it anyway.
>
> The comment in include/trace/events/sched.h says...
>
> * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
> * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
>
> So, I left it there. It would be great if all those @rq params can be
> removed tho. The latency tracer thing needs it, right?
I believe the rq was used by the original latency tracer code that was
in the -rt patch set before ftrace. It is most likely there for
historical purposes. I guess it would be fine to just remove it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists