[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272997616.1642.207.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 20:26:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, mingo@...e.hu, efault@....de,
avi@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf: add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out()
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:22 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 19:22 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 05/04/2010 07:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:38 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >> Add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out() so that its argument matches
> > >> those of trace_sched_switch(). This will help unifying notifiers in
> > >> sched.
> > >
> > > The alternative is dropping rq from the trace events, its not like
> > > anybody outside sched.o can do anything sensible with it anyway.
> >
> > The comment in include/trace/events/sched.h says...
> >
> > * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
> > * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
> >
> > So, I left it there. It would be great if all those @rq params can be
> > removed tho. The latency tracer thing needs it, right?
>
> I believe the rq was used by the original latency tracer code that was
> in the -rt patch set before ftrace. It is most likely there for
> historical purposes. I guess it would be fine to just remove it.
I'm building the below, so far so good... ;-)
---
include/trace/events/sched.h | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
kernel/sched.c | 8 ++++----
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index cfceb0b..4f733ec 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -51,15 +51,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
/*
* Tracepoint for waiting on task to unschedule:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
*/
TRACE_EVENT(sched_wait_task,
- TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p),
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
- TP_ARGS(rq, p),
+ TP_ARGS(p),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
@@ -79,15 +76,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_wait_task,
/*
* Tracepoint for waking up a task:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
*/
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
- TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
- TP_ARGS(rq, p, success),
+ TP_ARGS(p, success),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
@@ -111,31 +105,25 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
);
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup,
- TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
- TP_ARGS(rq, p, success));
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+ TP_ARGS(p, success));
/*
* Tracepoint for waking up a new task:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
*/
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new,
- TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success),
- TP_ARGS(rq, p, success));
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+ TP_ARGS(p, success));
/*
* Tracepoint for task switches, performed by the scheduler:
- *
- * (NOTE: the 'rq' argument is not used by generic trace events,
- * but used by the latency tracer plugin. )
*/
TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
- TP_PROTO(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next),
- TP_ARGS(rq, prev, next),
+ TP_ARGS(prev, next),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__array( char, prev_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 9a0f37c..2642864 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
* just go back and repeat.
*/
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
- trace_sched_wait_task(rq, p);
+ trace_sched_wait_task(p);
running = task_running(rq, p);
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
ncsw = 0;
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ out_activate:
success = 1;
out_running:
- trace_sched_wakeup(rq, p, success);
+ trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2580,7 +2580,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
- trace_sched_wakeup_new(rq, p, 1);
+ trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
@@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct mm_struct *mm, *oldmm;
prepare_task_switch(rq, prev, next);
- trace_sched_switch(rq, prev, next);
+ trace_sched_switch(prev, next);
mm = next->mm;
oldmm = prev->active_mm;
/*
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index 0271742..8052446 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ static void probe_wakeup_migrate_task(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
}
static void notrace
-probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *next)
+probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
{
struct trace_array_cpu *data;
cycle_t T0, T1, delta;
@@ -200,7 +199,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
}
static void
-probe_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int success)
+probe_wakeup(struct task_struct *p, int success)
{
struct trace_array_cpu *data;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists