[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:52:01 GMT
From: tip-bot for Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: acme@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tzanussi@...il.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, fweisbec@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/record: simplify TRACE_INFO tracepoint check
Commit-ID: db620b1c2fb172346dc54eb62bba9b4a117d173b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/db620b1c2fb172346dc54eb62bba9b4a117d173b
Author: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:20:16 -0500
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 5 May 2010 11:12:53 -0300
perf/record: simplify TRACE_INFO tracepoint check
Fix a couple of inefficiencies and redundancies related to
have_tracepoints() and its use when checking whether to write
TRACE_INFO.
First, there's no need to use get_tracepoints_path() in
have_tracepoints() - we really just want the part that checks whether
any attributes correspondo to tracepoints.
Second, we really don't care about raw_samples per se - tracepoints
are always raw_samples. In any case, the have_tracepoints() check
should be sufficient to decide whether or not to write TRACE_INFO.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
LKML-Reference: <1273030770.6383.6.camel@...picana>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 11 +----------
tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 0ff67d1..d3981ac 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -560,17 +560,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
return err;
}
- if (raw_samples && have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters)) {
+ if (have_tracepoints(attrs, nr_counters))
perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
- } else {
- for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++) {
- if (attrs[i].sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW &&
- attrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
- perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
- break;
- }
- }
- }
atexit(atexit_header);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
index 0a1fb9d..b157260 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
@@ -489,7 +489,13 @@ get_tracepoints_path(struct perf_event_attr *pattrs, int nb_events)
bool have_tracepoints(struct perf_event_attr *pattrs, int nb_events)
{
- return get_tracepoints_path(pattrs, nb_events) ? true : false;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nb_events; i++)
+ if (pattrs[i].type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
int read_tracing_data(int fd, struct perf_event_attr *pattrs, int nb_events)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists