[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273177360.1642.280.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 22:22:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Carl Love <carll@...ibm.com>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_events: PERF_FORMAT_GROUP not working correctly
when monitoring another task
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 13:09 -0700, Corey Ashford wrote:
> The patch works with the test case I provided, but for some reason it
> breaks the normal operation of the libpfm4 "task" utility. If I put
> more than one event in a group, I get zero counts on all but the first
> event. That's even if I don't use the PERF_FORMAT_GROUP option.
Bugger,.. weird though, I can't see how it would affect the state before
the counters get detached from their context (exit() / close()).
> So something appears to be messed up. I will see if I can construct an
> arch-independent test case which demonstrates the problem.
That would be awesome, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists