linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005061623060.15286@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n)

> When CONFIG_PM is not set:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init':
> bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags'
> bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags'

CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM,
so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n

Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI"
without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/