linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 May 2010 13:32:15 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n)

On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown wrote:

> > When CONFIG_PM is not set:
> > 
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init':
> > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags'
> > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags'
> 
> CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM,
> so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n
> 
> Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI"
> without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied?

Oh, thanks for the clue.

That would be a patch that I commented on and was ignored,
but James Morris merged it anyway.  Now it should be dropped.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/4/379

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/