| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100506133215.f5dc579a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:32:15 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n) On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown wrote: > > When CONFIG_PM is not set: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init': > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM, > so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n > > Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI" > without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied? Oh, thanks for the clue. That would be a patch that I commented on and was ignored, but James Morris merged it anyway. Now it should be dropped. http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/4/379 --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists