[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE4237A.8090701@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 07:28:10 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davej@...hat.com, kyle@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: introduce nonint_oldconfig and loose_nonint_oldconfig
(v3)
On 05/07/10 00:02, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:48:34PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
>> This patch has been around for a long time in Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise
>> Linux kernels and it may be useful for others. The nonint_oldconfig target
>> will fail and print the unset config options while loose_nonint_oldconfig will
>> simply let the config option unset. They're useful in distro kernel packages
>> where the config files are built using a combination of smaller config files.
>>
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote the initial nonint_config and Roland McGrath added the
>> loose_nonint_oldconfig.
>>
>> v2:
>> - when -B and -b are used, return "2" so the reason can be distinguished from
>> other errors
>> v3:
>> - help updated
>> - nonint_oldconfig won't update the config file if options are missing
>
> The patch looks fine, but, why the name 'nonint_oldconfig'?
> My English is not good enough to see what 'nonint' standards for...
non-interactive
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists