[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100507070257.GD5921@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:02:57 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davej@...hat.com, kyle@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: introduce nonint_oldconfig and
loose_nonint_oldconfig (v3)
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:48:34PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
>This patch has been around for a long time in Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise
>Linux kernels and it may be useful for others. The nonint_oldconfig target
>will fail and print the unset config options while loose_nonint_oldconfig will
>simply let the config option unset. They're useful in distro kernel packages
>where the config files are built using a combination of smaller config files.
>
>Arjan van de Ven wrote the initial nonint_config and Roland McGrath added the
>loose_nonint_oldconfig.
>
>v2:
>- when -B and -b are used, return "2" so the reason can be distinguished from
> other errors
>v3:
>- help updated
>- nonint_oldconfig won't update the config file if options are missing
The patch looks fine, but, why the name 'nonint_oldconfig'?
My English is not good enough to see what 'nonint' standards for...
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists