lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE77149.8050307@redflag-linux.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 10:36:57 +0800
From:	"潘卫平(Peter Pan)" 
	<wppan@...flag-linux.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:	tj@...nel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	hch@....de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2/ext3:useless code for return value

On 05/08/2010 12:23 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>> When rsv is the right hand side of goal, we should return NULL,
>> because now rsv's prev is NULL, or we return rsv.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Pan(潘卫平)<wppan@...flag-linux.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   fs/ext2/balloc.c |    6 +-----
>>   fs/ext3/balloc.c |    6 +-----
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
>> index 3cf038c..023990f 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
>> @@ -323,11 +323,7 @@ search_reserve_window(struct rb_root *root,
>> ext2_fsblk_t goal)
>>   	 * side of the interval containing the goal.  If it's the RHS,
>>   	 * we need to back up one.
>>   	 */
>> -	if (rsv->rsv_start>  goal) {
>> -		n = rb_prev(&rsv->rsv_node);
>> -		rsv = rb_entry(n, struct ext2_reserve_window_node, rsv_node);
>> -	}
>> -	return rsv;
>> +    return (rsv->rsv_start<  goal) ? rsv : NULL;
>    Hmm, I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. Suppose we have an RB-tree
> with two intervals 0-10, 20-30. Interval 0-10 is in the root. Now we search
> for goal 15. In the root we go to right because 10<15, in the next node we go
> to left because 15<  20. Then the loop terminates. Now your code would return
> NULL but previous code would return rb_prev of interval 20-30 which is 0-10.
> And that is what we want as far as I understand what we expect from the
> function...
>
> 								Honza
You got the point!
Many thanks.

Regards
-- 
Peter Pan
Red Flag Software Co.,Ltd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ