[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273459139.23699.4.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:38:59 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v14 00/22] Use lmb with x86
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 08:17 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> the new lmb could be used to replace early_res in x86.
>
> Suggested by: David, Ben, and Thomas
.../...
> Only first three patches in this set could affect original lmb users.
> lmb.c lines from 567 to 996
> If lmb guys are still not happy, we could move that 360 lines to arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
>
> still hope Ben could do lmb clean up on top of this patchset.
I would still like to do it the other way around :-)
My patches replace (and in some case are equivalent) to part of this
series, though I believe are cleaner, provide more readable changeset
comments and justifications, etc... it would be awkward to just apply
your stuff with "cleanup" passes from me on top of it.
I really prefer providing you with all the LMB infrastructure you need
so you can simply drop LMB changes from your series.
I'll be working on that today, finishing what I plan to finish and if I
get a chance (it's hard with one of the kids having a double ear
infection) see if I can rebase your work and at least compile test it.
Stay tuned...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists