[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100510030917.GB9181@owl>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:09:17 +0800
From: Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@...dl.org>
Cc: Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Get TjMax value
from MSR
On 15:29 Fri 07 May, Carsten Emde wrote:
> + err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(id, MSR_IA32_TEMPERATURE_TARGET, &eax, &edx);
> + if (err)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Unable to read TjMax from CPU.\n");
> + else {
> + val = (eax >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (val > 80 && val < 120) {
> + dev_info(dev, "TjMax is %dC.\n", val);
> + return val * 1000;
> + } else {
> + dev_warn(dev, "TjMax of %dC not plausible,"
> + " using 100C instead." , val);
> + return 100000;
> + }
> + }
The CPU, in the following case switch, may return no err at the above rdmsr. The
val is 0 with CPU model 0x0f in my test. The function should not return when
(val > 80 && val < 120) is false.
> +
> + /*
> + * An assumption is made for early CPUs and unreadable MSR.
> + * NOTE: the given value may not be correct.
> + */
> + switch (c->x86_model) {
> + case 0x0e:
> + case 0x0f:
> + case 0x16:
> + case 0x1a:
> + dev_warn(dev, "TjMax is assumed as 100C!\n");
> + return 100000;
> + break;
> + case 0x17:
> + case 0x1c: /* Atom CPUs */
> + return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_warn(dev, "CPU (model=0x%x) is not supported yet,"
> + " using default TjMax of 100C.\n", c->x86_model);
> + return 100000;
> + }
> +}
--
Thanks
Huaxu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists