[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE77C14.5010806@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 11:23:00 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Fix function declarations if !CONFIG_STACKTRACE
ftrace_trace_stack() and frace_trace_userstacke() take a
struct ring_buffer argument, not struct trace_array. Commit
e77405ad("tracing: pass around ring buffer instead of tracer")
made this change.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index d1ce0be..58f6896 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -405,12 +405,12 @@ void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags,
 void __trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long flags, int skip,
 		   int pc);
 #else
-static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
+static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
 				      unsigned long flags, int skip, int pc)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
+static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
 					  unsigned long flags, int pc)
 {
 }
-- 
1.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists