[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100510193118.GA5906@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:31:18 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
albert_herranz@...oo.es, linux@...elenboom.it, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com, jeremy@...p.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
alex.williamson@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] swiotlb: swiotlb_tbl_map_single: abstract out
swiotlb_virt_to_bus calls out.
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:41:15PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:29:26 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > We want to move that function out of swiotlb_tbl_map_single so that the caller
> > of this function does the virt->phys->bus address translation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > lib/swiotlb.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> It would be better to do something like that instead of spreading
> swiotlb_virt_to_bus()?
Yes! Thought I am confused by the name. In the past you mentioned 'tbl',
but here it is 'tlb'. I presume 'tbl' is the right one?
> Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: add swiotlb_tlb_map_single library function
>
> swiotlb_tlb_map_single() takes the dma address of iotlb instead of
> using swiotlb_virt_to_bus().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists