[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005102301.45729.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:01:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Cedric Le Goater <legoater@...e.fr>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> >> power management freezer code.
> >
> > I guess these three patches are for me.
> >
> > Do you want me to handle them?
>
> Yes, please, that would be great.
However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
appear to be margeable at this point. Is this correct?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists