linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1273528372.23699.108.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Tue, 11 May 2010 07:52:52 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...uxtronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each_lmb() and new accessors,
 and use it

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Can you please make this:
> 
> #define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region, __iter)                          \
>         for (__iter = lmb.lmb_type.regions;                             \
>              region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt);        \
>              region++)
> 
> so we do not have the iterator name hardcoded inside the macro body.

Oops, you are right, that's a thinko. I'll fix that.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/