linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 17:39:48 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...uxtronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each_lmb() and new accessors,
 and use it

On Mon, 10 May 2010, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>  
> +#define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region)					\
> +	for (reg = lmb.lmb_type.regions;				\
> +	     region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt);	\
> +	     region++)
> +

Can you please make this:

#define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region, __iter)				\
	for (__iter = lmb.lmb_type.regions;				\
	     region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt);	\
	     region++)

so we do not have the iterator name hardcoded inside the macro body.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/