[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100511065520.GK27497@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:55:20 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously
allocated request_queue
On Mon, May 10 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> blk_init_queue() allocates the request_queue structure and then
> initializes it as needed (request_fn, elevator, etc).
>
> Split initialization out to blk_init_allocated_queue_node.
> Introduce blk_init_allocated_queue wrapper function to model existing
> blk_init_queue and blk_init_queue_node interfaces.
>
> Export elv_register_queue to allow a newly added elevator to be
> registered with sysfs. Export elv_unregister_queue for symmetry.
>
> These changes allow DM to initialize a device's request_queue with more
> precision. In particular, DM no longer unconditionally initializes a
> full request_queue (elevator et al). It only does so for a
> request-based DM device.
Looks good, I'll apply this. I don't think the exports need to be _GPL
in this case, generally I've only done that with the exports for hooking
in a new IO scheduler.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists