[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100511163054.365239fe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:30:54 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alek Du <alek.du@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/mrst: change clock selection logic to support
medfield
> > + pr_debug("cpuid result %x\n", regs[CR_EAX]);
> > + pr_info("Moorestown CPU %s identified\n",
> > + (mrst_cpu_chip == MRST_CPU_CHIP_LINCROFT) ?
> > + "Lincroft" : "Penwell");
>
> Are we going to add one of those for each new family ? This is
> really redundant bloat with no value.
>
> > + return mrst_cpu_chip;
>From the driver side we need this value determined and visible to the
drivers because some things like the IPC interface need to know rather
than getting the cpuid magic replicated around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists