[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005111748040.3401@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:50:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alek Du <alek.du@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/mrst: change clock selection logic to support
medfield
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > + pr_debug("cpuid result %x\n", regs[CR_EAX]);
> > > + pr_info("Moorestown CPU %s identified\n",
> > > + (mrst_cpu_chip == MRST_CPU_CHIP_LINCROFT) ?
> > > + "Lincroft" : "Penwell");
> >
> > Are we going to add one of those for each new family ? This is
> > really redundant bloat with no value.
> >
> > > + return mrst_cpu_chip;
>
> From the driver side we need this value determined and visible to the
> drivers because some things like the IPC interface need to know rather
> than getting the cpuid magic replicated around.
Ok. That makes sense. Is there more what MRST drivers need to know ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists