[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100513051953.532821BC316@ruihe.smo.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: jiayingz@...gle.com (Jiaying Zhang)
To: hch@...radead.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mrubin@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] addjust discard request to be aligned with hwsect size to support SSDs with larger sector size
The currect blkdev_issue_discard() function assumes 512 sector size.
We have seen some problem when using discard on a SSD that has larger
sector size. The following patch adjusts the starting address and size of
a discard request to be aligned with hwsect size.
Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
diff --git a/block/blk-barrier.c b/block/blk-barrier.c
index 6d88544..576b7a1 100644
--- a/block/blk-barrier.c
+++ b/block/blk-barrier.c
@@ -376,14 +376,22 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
DISCARD_BARRIER : DISCARD_NOBARRIER;
struct bio *bio;
struct page *page;
+ int hwsect_shift = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) - 9;
+ int hwsect_mask = (1 << hwsect_shift) - 1;
+ sector_t end_sector;
int ret = 0;
if (!q)
return -ENXIO;
- if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
+ if (!blk_queue_discard(q) || q->limits.max_discard_sectors == 0)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (hwsect_shift > 0) {
+ end_sector = (sector + nr_sects) & ~hwsect_mask;
+ sector = (sector + hwsect_mask) & ~hwsect_mask;
+ nr_sects = end_sector - sector;
+ }
while (nr_sects && !ret) {
unsigned int sector_size = q->limits.logical_block_size;
unsigned int max_discard_sectors =
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists