linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/35] lmb: Add find_memory_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 09:44:46 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/35] lmb: Add find_memory_core_early()

On 05/14/2010 01:30 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:19:47 +1000
>
>   
>> OK, I'll have to let Davem deal with the fine point of the sparc bits,
>> but I think basically sparc has CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP set, but
>> the way it's NUMA affinity works, the early_node_map[] is crap, you
>> cannot rely on the ranges in there.
>>     
>   

> Right, we can't use early_node_map[] on sparc, because the NUMA
> mappings are far too granular to use that kind of representation.
>   
good to know.

early_node_map[] doesn't have enough slot?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/