lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273804238.21352.389.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 12:30:38 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/35] lmb: Add find_memory_core_early()

On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:19 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> According to node range in early_node_map[] with __lmb_find_area
> to find free range.
> 
> Will be used by lmb_find_area_node()
> 
> lmb_find_area_node will be used to find right buffer for NODE_DATA
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---

Oh and this wont' work on sparc. You should probably instead add a
lmb_find_in_nid() to lmb which shares code with lmb_alloc_nid().

However, why do you wnat to do this find + separate reserve again ? Why
not lmb_alloc ?

Cheers,
Ben.

>  include/linux/mm.h |    2 ++
>  mm/page_alloc.c    |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index fb19bb9..7774e1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,8 @@ extern void free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid,
>  						unsigned long max_low_pfn);
>  int add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az,
>  				   int nr_range, int nid);
> +u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
> +					u64 goal, u64 limit);
>  void *__alloc_memory_core_early(int nodeid, u64 size, u64 align,
>  				 u64 goal, u64 limit);
>  typedef int (*work_fn_t)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index d03c946..72afd94 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>  #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>  #include <linux/bootmem.h>
> +#include <linux/lmb.h>
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
> @@ -3393,6 +3394,34 @@ void __init free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_LMB
> +u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
> +					u64 goal, u64 limit)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* Need to go over early_node_map to find out good range for node */
> +	for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid) {
> +		u64 addr;
> +		u64 ei_start, ei_last;
> +
> +		ei_last = early_node_map[i].end_pfn;
> +		ei_last <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		ei_start = early_node_map[i].start_pfn;
> +		ei_start <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		addr = __lmb_find_area(ei_start, ei_last,
> +					 goal, limit, size, align);
> +
> +		if (addr == LMB_ERROR)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		return addr;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -1ULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  int __init add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az,
>  				   int nr_range, int nid)
>  {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ