linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_free_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 12:31:25 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_free_memory_size()

On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:19 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> It will return free memory size in specified range.
> 
> We can not use memory_size - reserved_size here, because some reserved area
> may not be in the scope of lmb.memory.region.
> 
> Use lmb.memory.region subtracting lmb.reserved.region to get free range array.
> then count size of all free ranges.

I remember having already told you that the naming sucks.

Also, you fail to explain what this is actually needed for.

Cheers,
Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/mm/lmb.c          |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
> index 358d8a6..4fb94b5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/lmb.h
> @@ -16,5 +16,6 @@ void lmb_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  					 unsigned long last_pfn);
>  u64 lmb_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
>  u64 lmb_find_area_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
> +u64 lmb_free_memory_size(u64 addr, u64 limit);
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
> index c5fa1dd..6c69e99 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/lmb.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,57 @@ void __init lmb_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +u64 __init lmb_free_memory_size(u64 addr, u64 limit)
> +{
> +	int i, count;
> +	struct range *range;
> +	int nr_range;
> +	u64 final_start, final_end;
> +	u64 free_size;
> +
> +	count = (lmb.reserved.cnt + lmb.memory.cnt) * 2;
> +
> +	range = find_range_array(count);
> +	nr_range = 0;
> +
> +	addr = PFN_UP(addr);
> +	limit = PFN_DOWN(limit);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < lmb.memory.cnt; i++) {
> +		struct lmb_region *r = &lmb.memory.regions[i];
> +
> +		final_start = PFN_UP(r->base);
> +		final_end = PFN_DOWN(r->base + r->size);
> +		if (final_start >= final_end)
> +			continue;
> +		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		nr_range = add_range(range, count, nr_range, final_start, final_end);
> +	}
> +	subtract_range(range, count, 0, addr);
> +	subtract_range(range, count, limit, -1ULL);
> +	for (i = 0; i < lmb.reserved.cnt; i++) {
> +		struct lmb_region *r = &lmb.reserved.regions[i];
> +
> +		final_start = PFN_DOWN(r->base);
> +		final_end = PFN_UP(r->base + r->size);
> +		if (final_start >= final_end)
> +			continue;
> +		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		subtract_range(range, count, final_start, final_end);
> +	}
> +	nr_range = clean_sort_range(range, count);
> +
> +	free_size = 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++)
> +		free_size += range[i].end - range[i].start;
> +
> +	return free_size << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
>  void __init lmb_add_memory(u64 start, u64 end)
>  {
>  	lmb_add_region(&lmb.memory, start, end - start);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/