[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1273944732.7807.6.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:32:12 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 19:07 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 14:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So basically make all RT wakeups sync?
>
> I was going to just skip subtracting waker's weight ala
>
> /*
> * If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
> * effect of the currently running task from the load
> * of the current CPU:
> */
> if (sync && !task_has_rt_policy(curr))
> ...
(not. hohum, something to piddle with over java manana)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists