[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF012B2.6080602@vflare.org>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 21:13:46 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Cyp <cyp561@...il.com>, driverdev <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramzswap: Remove backing swap support
Hi Minchan,
On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> One thing was about naming.
> Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify
> (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap.
> So I thought we would be better to more abstract name.
>
> I thought trim like naming as Linus said.
This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim
stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid
confusing it with trim/discard etc.
>
> Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged
> linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a
> interest in your good ramzswap. :)
>
Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :)
Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in
linux-next?
I can then send additional patches, if you raise any concerns that needs
further code changes.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists