[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1pr0u8igd.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:57:22 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: jiayingz@...gle.com (Jiaying Zhang)
Cc: hch@...radead.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mrubin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] addjust discard request to be aligned with hwsect size to support SSDs with larger sector size
>>>>> "Jiaying" == Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com> writes:
Jiaying,
Jiaying> The currect blkdev_issue_discard() function assumes 512 sector
Jiaying> size.
All of the block layer works on 512-byte sector units. We don't
generally convert to logical blocks until we're in the disk driver.
Jiaying> We have seen some problem when using discard on a SSD that has
Jiaying> larger sector size. The following patch adjusts the starting
Jiaying> address and size of a discard request to be aligned with hwsect
Jiaying> size.
Jiaying> + int hwsect_shift =
Jiaying> blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) - 9;
Let's stop using the term hardware sector size. It's an anachronism.
I guess I could understand if you aligned to the physical block size.
But the logical doesn't make much sense to me.
What is your logical block size? Right now we only handle 512 bytes and
4KB in the discard path.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists