[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikkNMPgc3ppjNvq1c_xwBB13hZ_AEMZymqRUjyn@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:27:28 -0700
From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mrubin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] addjust discard request to be aligned with hwsect
size to support SSDs with larger sector size
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:19:53PM -0700, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
>> The currect blkdev_issue_discard() function assumes 512 sector size.
>> We have seen some problem when using discard on a SSD that has larger
>> sector size. The following patch adjusts the starting address and size of
>> a discard request to be aligned with hwsect size.
>
> Looks good,
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
>> - if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
>> + if (!blk_queue_discard(q) || q->limits.max_discard_sectors == 0)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> But this change is unrelated. It's fine with me, but needs a patch of
> it's own with a proper description.
>
I will break the patch into two.
Thanks!
Jiaying
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists